Deciphering The Dac Divide: Cambridge Audio Dacmagic 200M Vs Smsl Su-9

In the realm of digital audio, the converter (DAC) holds immense significance, bridging the gap between digital signals and analog sound. Two prominent contenders in the high-end DAC market are Cambridge Audio‘s DACMagic 200M and SMSL’s SU-9. This article delves into a comprehensive comparison of these flagship DACs, exploring their features, performance, and value proposition.

Design and Build Quality

The DACMagic 200M exudes a classic and understated aesthetic, featuring a brushed aluminum chassis with a sleek black finish. It boasts a compact and lightweight design, making it an ideal choice for desktop setups. In contrast, the SMSL SU-9 adopts a more contemporary approach with its angular design and glossy black finish. Its larger footprint and robust construction convey a sense of solidity and durability.

Connectivity and Features

Both DACs offer a wide range of connectivity options, including USB, optical, coaxial, and balanced XLR inputs. The DACMagic 200M also features an asynchronous USB input for jitter reduction. Notably, the SMSL SU-9 supports MQA decoding, a lossless audio format that offers improved sound quality over standard FLAC and WAV files.

Digital Filtering and Processing

The DACMagic 200M employs a proprietary “Adaptive Time Filtering” algorithm that adjusts filter settings based on the incoming digital signal. This approach aims to optimize sound quality for different audio formats and sources. The SMSL SU-9, on the other hand, utilizes a fixed digital filter with four selectable settings.

DAC Chipset and Performance

Both DACs utilize high-performance DAC chips from ESS Technology. The DACMagic 200M features the ES9028Q2M chip, while the SMSL SU-9 employs the more advanced ES9038PRO chip. In terms of performance, the SMSL SU-9 boasts a slightly higher dynamic range and lower distortion than the DACMagic 200M.

Sound Quality

Subjectively, the DACMagic 200M delivers a warm and detailed sound with a natural and balanced tonal balance. Its wide soundstage and excellent imaging capabilities create an immersive listening experience. The SMSL SU-9, on the other hand, exhibits a more analytical and revealing sound with a wider frequency response. It excels in reproducing fine details and nuances, providing a more transparent and resolving sound.

Value Proposition and Conclusion

The DACMagic 200M offers exceptional sound quality and versatility at a competitive price point, making it a great value for money. Its compact design and user-friendly interface make it suitable for a wide range of audio systems. The SMSL SU-9, while more expensive, boasts superior performance, MQA decoding capabilities, and a more comprehensive feature set.

Ultimately, the choice between the DACMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 depends on individual preferences and budget constraints. If you prioritize a warm and natural sound, value for money, and a compact design, the DACMagic 200M is an excellent choice. If you seek the highest level of performance, MQA support, and a wider feature set, the SMSL SU-9 is the better option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which DAC has a better dynamic range?
A: The SMSL SU-9 has a slightly higher dynamic range than the DACMagic 200M.

Q: Does the DACMagic 200M support MQA decoding?
A: No, the DACMagic 200M does not support MQA decoding.

Q: Which DAC has more balanced XLR inputs?
A: Both the DACMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 have balanced XLR inputs.

Q: Is the DACMagic 200M compatible with Windows and Mac?
A: Yes, the DACMagic 200M is compatible with both Windows and Mac operating systems.

Q: Does the SMSL SU-9 have a remote control?
A: Yes, the SMSL SU-9 comes with a remote control for convenient operation.